Evaluation Wikipedia. Evaluation is a systematic determination of a subjects merit, worth and significance, using criteria governed by a set of standards. It can assist an organization, program, project or any other intervention or initiative to assess any aim, realisable conceptproposal, or any alternative, to help in decision making or to ascertain the degree of achievement or value in regard to the aim and objectives and results of any such action that has been completed. The primary purpose of evaluation, in addition to gaining insight into prior or existing initiatives, is to enable reflection and assist in the identification of future change. Evaluation is often used to characterize and appraise subjects of interest in a wide range of human enterprises, including the arts, criminal justice, foundations, non profit organizations, government, health care, and other human services. It is long term and done at the end of a period of time. Contents. 1Definition. Standards. 3Perspectives. Approaches. 4. 1. Classification of approaches. Summary of approaches. Pseudo evaluation. Visual Foxpro Driver 64 Bit. Objectivist, elite, quasi evaluation. Objectivist, mass, quasi evaluation. Objectivist, elite, true evaluation. Objectivist, mass, true evaluation. Subjectivist, elite, true evaluation. Subject, mass, true evaluation. Client centered. Methods and techniques. See also. 7References. External links. DefinitioneditEvaluation is the structured interpretation and giving of meaning to predicted or actual impacts of proposals or results. What Are The Types Of Program Evaluations' title='What Are The Types Of Program Evaluations' />It looks at original objectives, and at what is either predicted or what was accomplished and how it was accomplished. So evaluation can be formative, that is taking place during the development of a concept or proposal, project or organization, with the intention of improving the value or effectiveness of the proposal, project, or organisation. It can also be summative, drawing lessons from a completed action or project or an organisation at a later point in time or circumstance. Evaluation is inherently a theoretically informed approach whether explicitly or not, and consequently any particular definition of evaluation would have been tailored to its context  the theory, needs, purpose, and methodology of the evaluation process itself. Having said this, evaluation has been defined as A systematic, rigorous, and meticulous application of scientific methods to assess the design, implementation, improvement, or outcomes of a program. Types+of+Program+Evaluations.jpg' alt='Different Types Of Program Evaluations' title='Different Types Of Program Evaluations' />It is a resource intensive process, frequently requiring resources, such as, evaluate expertise, labor, time, and a sizable budget3The critical assessment, in as objective a manner as possible, of the degree to which a service or its component parts fulfills stated goals St Leger and Wordsworth Bell. The focus of this definition is on attaining objective knowledge, and scientifically or quantitatively measuring predetermined and external concepts. A study designed to assist some audience to assess an objects merit and worth Stufflebeam. In this definition the focus is on facts as well as value laden judgments of the programs outcomes and worth. PurposeeditThe main purpose of a program evaluation can be to determine the quality of a program by formulating a judgment Marthe Hurteau, Sylvain Houle, Stphanie Mongiat 2. An alternative view is that projects, evaluators, and other stakeholders including funders will all have potentially different ideas about how best to evaluate a project since each may have a different definition of merit. The core of the problem is thus about defining what is of value. From this perspective, evaluation is a contested term, as evaluators use the term evaluation to describe an assessment, or investigation of a program whilst others simply understand evaluation as being synonymous with applied research. There are two function considering to the evaluation purpose Formative Evaluations provide the information on the improving a product or a process Summative Evaluations provide information of short term effectiveness or long term impact to deciding the adoption of a product or process. Not all evaluations serve the same purpose some evaluations serve a monitoring function rather than focusing solely on measurable program outcomes or evaluation findings and a full list of types of evaluations would be difficult to compile. This is because evaluation is not part of a unified theoretical framework,7 drawing on a number of disciplines, which include management and organisational theory, policy analysis, education, sociology, social anthropology, and social change. DiscussioneditHowever, the strict adherence to a set of methodological assumptions may make the field of evaluation more acceptable to a mainstream audience but this adherence will work towards preventing evaluators from developing new strategies for dealing with the myriad problems that programs face. It is claimed that only a minority of evaluation reports are used by the evaluand client Datta, 2. One justification of this is that when evaluation findings are challenged or utilization has failed, it was because stakeholders and clients found the inferences weak or the warrants unconvincing Fournier and Smith, 1. Some reasons for this situation may be the failure of the evaluator to establish a set of shared aims with the evaluand, or creating overly ambitious aims, as well as failing to compromise and incorporate the cultural differences of individuals and programs within the evaluation aims and process. None of these problems are due to a lack of a definition of evaluation but are rather due to evaluators attempting to impose predisposed notions and definitions of evaluations on clients. The central reason for the poor utilization of evaluations is arguablyby whom due to the lack of tailoring of evaluations to suit the needs of the client, due to a predefined idea or definition of what an evaluation is rather than what the client needs are House, 1. Torrent Kelly Payne. The development of a standard methodology for evaluation will require arriving at applicable ways of asking and stating the results of questions about ethics such as agent principal, privacy, stakeholder definition, limited liability and could the money be spent more wisely issues. StandardseditDepending on the topic of interest, there are professional groups that review the quality and rigor of evaluation processes. Evaluating programs and projects, regarding their value and impact within the context they are implemented, can be ethically challenging. Evaluation is a systematic determination of a subjects merit, worth and significance, using criteria governed by a set of standards. It can assist an organization. Staff directory, calendar, fee schedule, forms and publications. Supervisors and officers tend to dislike dealing with performance evaluations PEs as much as they dislike internal affairs investigations and termination proceedings. Family code. title 5. Evaluators may encounter complex, culturally specific systems resistant to external evaluation. Furthermore, the project organization or other stakeholders may be invested in a particular evaluation outcome. Finally, evaluators themselves may encounter conflict of interest COI issues, or experience interference or pressure to present findings that support a particular assessment. Chief Evaluation Office CEO U. S. Department of Labor. DOL Scholars Program. The 2. 01. 7 2. 01. DOL Scholars will conduct and complete research between August 2. August 2. 01. 8. Projects focus on a range of labor related topics such as contingent work in the U. S. labor market the interplay among labor markets on American Indian reservations, tribal policy, and Native economic health job characteristics and job retention of workers with disabilities and variations in unemployment and re employment rates by local economic conditions. Read more about the work of this years scholars here. Labor Research and Evaluation Grant Awards. The U. S. Department of Labor announced the award of 1. Labor Research and Evaluation Grants to support university based research of workforce policies and programs. Learn about tests and tools used to diagnose stomach cancer. Get information on diagnostic tests and endoscopic procedures for stomach cancer at CTCA hospitals. Specialization. Many American attorneys limit their practices to specialized fields of law. Often dichotomies are drawn between different types of attorneys, but. Some Major Types of Program Evaluation. When designing your evaluation approach, it may be helpful to review the following three types of evaluations, which are. Types Of Program Evaluations' title='Types Of Program Evaluations' />These grants will help to increase awareness and build the capacity of the American people to understand critical issues related to Labor Department programs, the labor force and the American worker. The grants, administered by the departments Chief Evaluation Office, will fund research and evaluation on a variety of important topics that will provide insight into labor policies and programs for the benefit of the general public and program administrators. More information can be found here. UPDATE Chief Evaluation Officer. On November 1. 4, 2. U. S. Department of Labor announced the selection of Dr. Types Of Program Evaluations In Education' title='Types Of Program Evaluations In Education' />Molly Irwin to lead the Chief Evaluation Office. As the Chief Evaluation Officer, Dr. Irwin is responsible for coordinating the Departments evaluation agenda, working with agencies to design and implement evaluations, and overseeing the data analytics unit. Dr. Irwin, as a career leader, will work to institutionalize the incredible progress the Office has experienced since its inception in 2. Read more on Dr. Irwin. Worker Leave Studies. CEO has initiated several research and evaluation projects to examine worker leave programs. These analyses examine various types of paid and unpaid leave programs, including FMLA, state leave, employerfirm leave, and temporary disability leave, and determine how different programs affect individuals labor force activity, employment, earnings, and household income. DOL Workplace Flexibilities Pilot Evaluation. CEO conducted an analysis of the DOL Workplace Flexibilities Pilot. Behavioral Insights. CEO is testing the application of behavioral insights, or understanding how people make and act on decisions, to improve performance and outcomes within selected DOL programs and populations. White House Social and Behavioral Science Team is leading the Federal Governments Behavioral Insights initiatives. Read the Social and Behavioral Sciences Team 2.